In June 2005 the OSBC got a grievance from a Kansas consumer about a loan deal with Quik Payday
On May 19, 2006, shortly before the scheduled go out associated with administrative hearing, Quik Payday recorded this lawsuit under 42 U
Beneath the KUCCC a customer’s property is the address given by the consumer as their address a€?in any writing closed by the customers relating to a credit score rating purchase.a€? Id. A§ 16a-1-201(6). The law cannot determine a€?solicitation.a€? Defendants conceded in section judge, however, that simply sustaining a web page easily obtainable in Kansas that advertises payday advances isn’t solicitation in Kansas under A§ 16a-1-201(1)(b). Read Quik Payday, Inc. v. Stork, 509 F.Supp.2d 974, 982 n. 7 (D.Kan.2007).